The Webmaster's Corner

![]()
Why would a nursery webmaster include a bunch of stuff about the Republic of Panama? (Because he can, that's why.) If you are not interested in the rest of the world, there is plenty of gardening-related stuff (much) further on down the page. Click here to preview Tom's new book: "A Panama Journal". (The writing below is excerpted from that book.) Or, if you prefer artwork inspired by the living world, Tom has another book for you: "Biomorphs". Click here to have a look at that. Not to mention (well, why not?) the big photo companion to the Journal, "Chiriqui - The Valley of the Moon". Click aqui for Chiriqui. It has a lot of photos like this one:
The Strangely Long (Though Here Heavily Abbreviated)
and Somewhat Confusing
(Not to Say Bizarre)
HISTORY OF PANAMA (OK, Let’s Say Bizarre)
There is not a rich heritage of sensational ancient civilizations in Panama of the likes of the Inca and the Maya. It is thought
that there were people there about twelve thousand years ago and that is presumably by
default because there were people in this part of the world then. And today, there
are still many indigenous tribes in Panama, but tribes whose names you have
likely never heard: Ngobe-Buglé in the western highlands and eastern Costa Rica, Kuna Yala, Wounaan, Emberá; seven in all remain. Indigenas,
they are called, rather than “Indians”, which is allegedly pejorative. Big trouble started around 1500 with the arrival of: the Spanish, of course. Looking for gold, as was their wont. The first mate on
the first trip was a chap named Vasco Nuñez de Balboa. Shortly after that, another
Spaniard named Cristobal Colón showed up in Bocas del Toro, which is that very
tropical area on Panama’s west Caribbean coast. We know him as Christopher
Columbus. He named some things, apparently, then left the new world for good.
Too many Spaniards there, I guess. Balboa, for whom Panama’s currency is now
named, even though their currency is actually American dollars, go figure, was
getting deeply into debt in the Dominican Republic and escaped his creditors, so
the story goes, by actually stowing away on a boat bound for Panama, in the
grand tradition of all national heroes. So, of course, he returns to the isthmus and goes to the Darien, of all
places, and starts subjugating native peoples, according to the standard
operating procedure for Europeans vacationing in the new world. Long story
short, Balboa decides, in the year 1513, to hack his way west into the jungle
and, quite remarkably, actually makes it to the Pacific ocean in less than a
month, where, of course, he claimed the western half of the planet for the
Spanish king. Because, see, he “discovered” it. The Indigenous Ones probably
didn’t think so, but… I call this remarkable because I once saw one of those TV
nature adventure specials where a modern team of adventurers tried to cross the
Darien and were utterly unable to do so. They ended up, after many days of
trekking, right back where they started. They blamed the guide. Anyway, whatever nasty things Balboa may have done in his time, he was
re-paid for them by having his head cut off by a rival Spaniard governor named,
no kidding, “Pedrarias the Cruel”. If I were hanging around with a dude named
anything “the Cruel”, I do believe I would stay alert. He (the cruel guy)
founded what later became Panama City. The next thing everyone always mentions is that
the Englishman Henry Morgan sacks and burns Panama City in 1671. No one ever
says why, though. (Actually, the story of Henry Morgan is rather amazing, but
too long to go into here.) I suppose the Spaniards couldn’t find any more gold or
something, because they granted Colombia, Panama, Ecuador and Venezuela their
independence in 1821. Panama, however, was still part of Colombia, and many Panamanians disapproved of this situation. (I am
skipping a lot of historical mayhem here.) Now, what really happened after this was that the
French tried to build a canal across the country and failed miserably, but the
Americans thought they could pull it off. Colombia wasn’t interested in further
foreign investment, however, and demurred. Knowing that there was an independence
movement in Panama, the US said, basically, “We’ve got your back”. US
warships showed up off the shores of Panama and, since the ocean is really the only
way you can get from Colombia to Panama, the former country just gave up and
Panama was a new country and the US had a canal project underway. Strangely, the
Colombian forces showed up on the north side of the country and planned to take
the train to Panama city to hold their war. Really. Someone had the foresight to
pull all but one little train over to the capital, leaving a note for the
commander to hop into the single car remaining and pop over for a visit. This he
did, whereupon he was promptly arrested. You can't make this stuff up. This was in 1903 and so, Panama has two independence days: one from Spain and another
from Colombia. Well, three actually, if you count 1999 when the US gave them
back their canal and finally left town. And we just had the one little invasion
thingy back in 1989 where George Bush the First decided to take out the unpopular dictator Manuel Noriega
and ship him to Miami on drug charges. There are a series of amusing (and some
not so amusing) things
about this, as he was receiving a good deal of CIA money at one time. Which was not
unusual for Central American dictators who ran drugs as a hobby. Of course,
Noriega had seized power after a general named Torrijos died in a plane crash, who
was actually popular even though he seized power from a guy named
Arias, who was actually elected. It was Torrijos who negotiated the return of the canal
with Jimmy Carter. Noriega was bivouacked in a Catholic church or some such (I
am too lazy to look this up) for sanctuary and the US forces allegedly drove him
out by blasting Ted Nugent songs from an outdoor speaker system 24 hours a day. )
That would certainly break my will to live. At least, this is what we saw on TV in
the US. My memory of this is not perfect, but it seemed to me at the time that
this was something in the nature of a fraternity prank. What we were not
told was that tens of thousands of Panamanians lost their homes in our little
invasion and over 500 of them were killed. Maybe a lot more than that. Thousands
went into US prison camps, according to one source I read. There is speculation
that one of the reasons for the invasion was to destroy the Panamanian army,
thus paving the way for a continued US military presence in the country to
"protect the canal" - even after turning the canal over to Panama. OK, so after Noriega, and (eventually)
after the US military installed some sort of government of their own choosing, Panama started having
elections again. Are you ready to hear who is the current elected president at the time of this writing? Torrijos’
son, that’s who. But the fun doesn’t stop there. Guess who finally is supposed to get out of jail in
September of 2007. If you guessed Manuel Noriega, you would be correct. He wants to
return to Panama, but France wants him extradited on money laundering charges.
I believe he is also wanted in Panama on murder charges. Some old girlfriend of
his wants him back uncharged, so to speak. She likes him a whole bunch despite
his complexion (his nickname was “pineapple face”) and tried to whip up a
rally of support for his triumphant return in Panama City last month. Reportedly,
almost a half dozen people attended the festivities. I read that there is now a
law in place in Panama that people over a certain age cannot be held in prison.
If this is true, and if we do send him home, I guess he could sit around on a
veranda sipping Ron Abuelo and watching the birds flit by. So that is my lightning summary
of the history of Panama. I may have left a few things out.
The Panama Canal
Frankly, I haven’t mentioned the canal much. The guidebooks go on and on about the canal and I didn’t really visit it as such, so
I ignored the topic here. However, when you consider the fact that we finally
managed to undo what tectonic floating plates did three million years ago in
joining the two continents; I guess it really is a big deal. The French attempt at the canal was an abject
failure. Not only did the bankruptcy deeply wound the French economy, but they
also lost the lives of about 22,000 workers. (22,000!) The Americans had the
good sense to eradicate yellow fever and malaria before making their attempt,
but, even so, they lost 5,000 men before the canal was completed in 1914.
I have
mentioned the continental divide before because I did visit that. It is
much lower in elevation at the canal crossing, but still, it does rise to 270
feet above sea level there. Or rather, it did. The digging and dredging of
Culebra Cut continues today. It was only supposed to be 300 feet wide but,
because the walls kept collapsing, it ended up being a lot wider than that. They
dammed the Chagres River, creating Lake Gatun, which, in turn is connected to
the Caribbean Sea and the Pacific Ocean by three locks on each end of the canal.
When they created the lake, some mountains became islands. One of them of over
3700 acres is called Barro Colorado, which is where the Smithsonian Institute
has maintained a tropical research station since 1946. About 200 scientists a
year come here to do research – right in the middle of the Panama Canal. But
wait! There’s more! I have some summary remarks scheduled for later in this
piece, but first, a little bit of information on the Darien Rainforest. Concerning the Darien
Lest you think I am naïve about the Darien province, let me point out that I am
aware of the other “little problem” of that region. Besides jungle, I mean. That
is, the drug runners and gun-toting guerrilla crazies who like to kidnap people
for a hobby. There is a national park there – quite a large one - and there are
a few adventure resorts which are supposed to be safe to visit. The most
dangerous areas, I am told, are inland south and east of Yaviza (where the Pan
American Highway ends pathetically in a dirt road) and up to the northern coast
and, of course, into Colombia. As I mentioned, there is (still) no road between
Colombia and Panama. They call this the “Darien Gap”. It is the only break in
the whole Pan-American Highway. Colombia, lately, has expressed a desire to
close the gap and open a road through. Panama always has refused to do this. (I
suspect they remember the colonial days.) People have been told
over and over again not to enter this region. By the US State Department, by
locals, by the Lonely Planet guide, even. However, in the year 2000, upon
hearing that someone had actually managed to hike through from Panama to
Colombia, two young crazy guys, Tom Hart Dyke and Paul Winder (orchid collector
and adventure traveler respectively) decided to try it as well. They almost made it to Colombia before being ambushed by the notorious FARC
guerrillas who held them hostage for nine months, hoping to get ransom. Finally,
their captors grew tired of dragging them all over the Darien waiting for ransom
money which never appeared and…released them! Well, it makes for a good yarn and
you can read it for yourself in a book they wrote called The Cloud Garden – A
Story of Adventure, Survival, and Extreme Horticulture. I recommend it. I
also love the title. Oh,
and if you were wondering why the families of these two young fools did not pay
the ransom, it was because they never got the ransom note. Those Shining Path
rebel types were never known for having a good public relations department. Concerning the Republic of Panama and Various Rumors
Concerning Same So now: Good things about Panama? Many things! The nature views of mountains, the
weather, the huge diversity of plant life, friendly people, and the low cost of
living. Worst things: Diesel exhaust and scary roads. Possibly, probably, I can
get used to the latter. I found areas that, while attractive, are not practical
to live in because of the excessive amount of driving required to get to David.
I discovered some promising areas I did not know existed. Made some contacts,
discovered that every plant that grows in Miami will grow in the Chiriqui
highlands, plus many more besides. I found out that Panamanians do not litter or
beg (though this might not be true in Panama City) and though a lot of the
indigenous peoples may be very poor by our standards, they seem to be content.
I
also discovered that Panamanians have seemingly repealed the law of gravity and
can walk straight up steep rock roads all day long without breaking a sweat or
stopping to rest. (Could we eventually adapt to do this as well?)
I discovered Gunnera and tree ferns growing in the wild along with huge trees I
did not recognize. (This is a big deal for a botanist.) I found out that there
is an absolutely huge amount of virgin mountain forest in Panama. Real estate
sharpies are trying to trick Americans into panic buying – into thinking that
all the good land is going fast, but this is not the case. There is still plenty
of inexpensive land, I think. There is, however, the question of Volcan Baru. The US Coast &
Geodetic survey says it will erupt again - very likely with devastating results
to the western highlands, including Boquete, Volcan especially, and perhaps even
David and Concepcion. Personally, I'm now looking a bit further east. So now: I also found out what I suspected all along – that the
gated communities are to be avoided by people like us at all costs (except
possibly one on the continental divide, which may turn out to be very special) and that many
other Americans there agree with us on this point. The Americans, Canadians,
English, Germans and, most importantly, Panamanians are friendly and helpful.
Every foreigner I talked to there said they love the place. Did I mention that
Boquete was founded by Europeans? That’s what the books say. “Boquete” is an
actual word in Spanish meaning something like “gap”, among other things. It is
in a valley surrounded on all sides by mountains, so I guess that makes sense.
And now, back to horticulture: 

![]()
THE QUESTION AND ANSWER THING
The following is, in the familiar "Question and Answer" format, sort of a spoof on gardening, our nursery and life in general. We make up the answers and, to be honest, we make up some of the questions as well.
CARE OF ZINGIBERALES
Q. Care of what???
A: It's the order of plants which contains bananas, heliconias, gingers, birds of paradise and a few other tropical and subtropical herbaceous plants.
Q. Oh, I see. Are you going to give me some kind of magic potion that will make these plants thrive?
A. Yes. These plants are not accustomed to growing in the impoverished soils of South Florida. They have evolved to grow in rich volcanic soils, so they don't get all the nutrients they need here. Well-drained soil is usually the best and organic matter and mulch along with adequate moisture (but not soggy soil) is a good starting place. After one of our "cold" winters especially they sometimes need a bit of a pick-me-up cocktail (not to mention some judicious pruning). Here is what we use in addition to a regular (say 2 or 3 times a year) application of a balanced fertilizer with minors:
For each gallon of water, add:
one tablespoon of a complete liquid fertilizer such as Peters 20-20-20 with minor elements (sometimes called micronutrients on the label)
plus one tablespoon of potassium nitrate
and one tablespoon of epsom salts. Epsom salt is actually magnesium sulfate heptahydrate. Our soils are deficient in magnesium and these plants need it.
Beginning in late winter or spring, apply as both a foliar spray and as a soil drench every two weeks until the plants start looking green and healthy. After that, once a month is usually sufficient. All these chemicals are fairly inexpensive. This treatment is actually good for just about any plant, but is especially helpful for the Zingiberales and other herbaceous tropicals like aroids. (When you want blooms, you can substitute one of the "Bloom Buster" formulas of liquid fertilizer. They will have a formula like 10-50-10 or 10-60-10.)
![]()
HOW BEST TO WHACK
Q. I use a weed-whacker to clean up the grass and weeds that grow around the trunks of the trees in my yard. I work carefully around the trunk but I often still end up injuring the bark.
A. That isn't a question.
Q. Oh, right. What I want to know is, what is the best technique for whacking weeds around the tree trunks in order to avoid injury to the tree?
A. You take the whacker and turn it upside down and over and you will see a spool containing monofilament line. Twirl that knob and remove the spool. That's all there is to it.
Q. Well, that's....that won't get rid of the weeds, then, will it?
A. No, but it will prevent injury of the trunk.
Q. Any other options?
A. Sure. Keep the weed whacker turned off or don't put gas in it. Those strategies work well, too.*
Seriously, it is almost impossible to avoid injuring tree trunks with this kind of equipment. They are useful for edging and other things, but around trees I recommend you use Roundup or Finale spray; just keep it off the foliage and green bark of things you don't want to kill. Don't apply it when it is windy, for example. Don't apply it if it looks like it's going to rain, either. The chemical needs to be able to sit on the leaf for a few hours in order to work. It takes about a week to see results (you would swear that nothing has happened when you look at the weeds a few days after application), but it kills weeds completely. Fruit growers would be lost without herbicides. And it is pretty benign; it is a growth regulator, not some horrible toxin, and it breaks down fairly quickly after application. You don't need to drench everything, just get some on the leaves of those plants you have chosen to condemn to death. There are a few types of weeds (mostly vines) that are resistant, but not that many. Happy hunting!
* Note: It is possible to whack around trunks if you are very careful and very patient and have a good, variable-speed machine such as a Stihl. Even then, it takes some practice and the thing can still just get away from you and wound your tree.
![]()
GUARANTEE?
Q. Do you guarantee your plants? Home Depot does.
A. Well, that is a complex question, actually. We do guarantee that our plants are identified properly and that they have no diseases. If that should happen - and it has happened only a few times since we opened on February 1, 1993, then yes, we will replace or refund. But we can't guarantee that you won't kill the plant. There are so many ways to kill plants. We figure, if we have grown the plant successfully for a year or two or three and you take it home and it dies, then the likelihood is great that it was something you did or didn't do - like water it, for example. That said, we have actually never refused to replace a plant except for the guy who special-ordered a Eucalyptus tree, then left it sitting in the pot in the sun without water for a week.
Home Depot does not actually guarantee their plants, by the way; their growers do. If they want to do business with HD they have to be willing to replace anything, regardless of whatever bonehead thing the customer may do to the plant. They deal in huge numbers of plants and calculate when setting the price that a certain number of people will return dead plants for a refund. That way everybody pays a little bit for the incompetence of a few - sort of like the way insurance companies operate.
PESTICIDES
We spray very little at the nursery. Very little. Some nurseries spray insecticides every week and we know one grower who sprays every three days! This is madness, in our opinion. Not only are you filling your environment with toxic materials, but you are killing off beneficial organisms that help you to control them. This is sort of like executing the police force along with the criminals. In addition, you are causing un-natural selection. The small populations of pests that are resistant to a given pesticide will find themselves without competition and will become large populations of pests resistant to the spray. This is not a good thing. So, ironically, the more you spray, the more pests you have around. Personally, I believe that all that spraying isn't very good for the plants, either.
So. What we do is spray only when we observe a population explosion that is really causing some serious damage. The drawback to this rational approach is that we don't get to examine the plants as often as we would like and every once in a while we get caught off guard and some plants take a beating. This is painful, but you would be surprised how fast they can recover after one of these episodes.
![]()
LOOKING FOR A PLANT (Real question)
Q. Do you have that tree that grows in front of the Miller building? I like it.
A. Um...the Miller Building?
Q. Yeah, it's kind of tall and has...
A. Green leaves?
Q. Yeah, the leaves are all greeny.
A. Possibly.
![]()
TOM'S MATRIX OF PLANT DESCRIPTIONS
It seems that the way a particular plant species is described by an individual is tremendously dependent upon their personal point of view, so I have prepared a little guide to help you understand the lingo.
| Plant Characteristics | Description if you like the plant | Description if you don't like the plant |
| Shows up in your yard without actually being planted | Self-seeding, naturalized, native | A weed |
| Does not require watering or fertilization | Hardy, maintenance-free, good for xeriscape | Invasive, Impossible to kill |
| Does not withstand freezing temperatures | Tropical | Not cold hardy and unsuited to our South Florida environment! |
| Withstands freezing temperatures | Hardy | It certainly isn't very tropical! |
| Bears colorful flowers | Gorgeous flowering species, color accent | Gaudy blooms, messy |
| Almost any plant of any size | A real find | Too big (or, alternately, too small) |
| Bears insignificant or no flowers | A striking foliage plant | Useless |
| Acts as a host to butterfly larvae | Butterfly attractor, wildlife friendly | Has caterpillar problems |
| Produces edible fruit | Food plant, fruit-bearing, wildlife attractor | Messy, attracts pests |
| Does not produce edible fruit | Stunning ornamental | Useless |
| Tree that gets very tall | Stately appearance, specimen | Too big for most Florida yards |
| Tree that spreads out a lot | Specimen canopy tree | Too big for most Florida yards, shades out perennials |
| Native to some other location | Exotic tropical, rare, collector's plant | Non-native exotic pest |
| Native to South Florida | Established native species | Boring and leggy |
| Produces a heavy crown of leaves | Superior shade tree | Grass-killer |
| Does not need much water once established | Excellent for xeriscape, low maintenance | Scrawny little thing, hard to eradicate |
| Is commonly used in landscaping in the area | Well-established, old standby, heirloom species | Everybody has that junk! |
| Rarely used in landscaping in the area | Rare, collector's item, inspired landscaping | What kind of weird stuff did they plant in their yard now? |
![]()
